Blog · LinkedIn advice
ATS keywords: mirror the advert or get filtered
If the advert says NEC3 and your CV says NEC, the ATS misses you. 75% of CVs are filtered before a human sees them — use their exact words.
Most mid-size and corporate employers run an applicant tracking system (ATS) between your application and a human. It does one job: match your CV's language to the advert's language. Not the meaning — the literal words.
", 'The exact-words rule
', "The advert says NEC3. Your CV says NEC. You have NEC3 experience — the ATS doesn't know that. It knows the string “NEC3” didn't appear. Same with “Primavera P6” vs “P6”, “Sage X3” vs “Sage”, “financial modelling” vs “modeling” (SA spelling: modelling, but if the advert wrote modeling, write modeling). Mirror their exact keywords where your experience genuinely matches — never where it doesn't.
", 'Where the keywords live
', "Job title, headline, skills list, and the first two roles. The ATS weights the top third of your CV more heavily — which is also where the human's six seconds go. Two documents, same rule: front-load the proof.
", 'The honesty line
', "Keyword-stuffing a CV with skills you don't have gets you the interview and then the rejection — worse than no interview, because you've burned the recruiter. Mirror only what's true. Our Pro apply tool does exactly this: it restructures your CV against the advert's keywords and marks honestly what's proven vs what's missing.
", 'Run the free audit first — it shows you where your profile drops off. Here.
']Check how your profile scores on this.
Run my free audit