Blog · LinkedIn advice
Recommendations that actually carry weight
Two contextual recommendations beat ten generic ones. Ask the supervisor who saw your hardest work — and hand them the project to speak to.
A profile with zero recommendations reads as unverified — nobody who worked with you volunteered to say anything. But a wall of “great to work with, true professional” recommendations adds nothing either. Recruiters skip those.
', 'What carries weight: context
', "The recommendation that lands names the work: “Aidan ran the NEC4 administration on our four-site programme — his compensation-event discipline kept us out of two disputes that would have cost us seven figures.” That's evidence. It gives the recruiter a project, a method, and an outcome.
", 'How to get one
', "1. Pick the supervisor or client who saw your hardest work. 2. Write it for them — draft the two-sentence version you'd want published (people publish what you hand them, edited lightly). 3. Offer to reciprocate with one for them, about their actual work. Two contextual recommendations — a direct supervisor and a client — move the Credibility dimension of our audit more than ten generic ones.
", 'Whom to skip
', "Peers who'll say anything nice. Family (recruiters check surnames). Anyone who'd write “hardworking and passionate” — that's a wasted slot on your profile.
", 'The Credibility dimension scores your recommendations\' presence and context. Run the free audit to see what\'s missing.
']Check how your profile scores on this.
Run my free audit